NEWS

Himachal Pradesh High Court: Caste Assigned at Birth Cannot Change Through Marriage

In a significant ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has held that caste is determined at birth and does not change through marriage, impacting the application of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

New Delhi Chronicle Staff Reporter

Shimla:The Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled that caste is determined at birth and does not change if a person marries into a Scheduled Caste community. The decision came in the case of State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sarojioni (Cr. Revision No. 377 of 2013), decided on July 28, 2025.

Justice Rakesh Kainthla, delivering the judgment, clarified that such a marriage does not exempt an individual from prosecution under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

“Caste is assigned to a person at birth and remains unchanged throughout their lifetime,” Justice Kainthla observed. “The Trial Court erred in holding that the accused became a member of the Scheduled Caste community after her marriage and could not be prosecuted under Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act.”

What Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act States

Under Section 3(1)(s) of the Act, it is a punishable offence to abuse or insult a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe by using their caste name in any place within public view.

Trial Court’s Finding and High Court Reversal

The Trial Court had earlier concluded that the accused, by marrying a man from a Scheduled Caste community, automatically became part of that community and therefore could not commit an offence under Section 3(1)(s).

Challenging this interpretation, the State filed a criminal revision petition, asserting that caste is immutable and cannot be altered through marriage.

The High Court accepted this contention, setting aside the Trial Court’s decision and remanding the case for reconsideration regarding the framing of charges.

Case Details
• Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sarojioni
• Case Number: Cr. Revision No. 377 of 2013
• Date of Judgment: 28 July 2025
• For the Petitioner: Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General
• For the Respondent: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate

This ruling reinforces the legal position that caste identity in India is determined by birth and remains unaltered by marriage, with important implications for cases under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

ndcadmin

Recent Posts

Spain Wins FIFA World Cup 2026: Ferran Torres Extra-Time Strike Downs Argentina 1-0

Byline: Sports Bureau, New Delhi Chronicle EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ — Spain claimed their second FIFA…

9 hours ago

IND vs ENG 3rd ODI: Rohit Sharma’s Brilliant Century In Vain as England Edge India in Lord’s Run-Fest to Seal Series 2-1

Byline: Sports Bureau, New Delhi Chronicle Dateline: London | Updated: July 20, 2026 LONDON: A…

10 hours ago

Aditya Dhar Next Movie: ‘Dhurandhar’ Director in Talks to Helm Epic Biopic on Ahom General Lachit Borphukan

Entertainment Bureau, New Delhi Chronicle Following the buzz surrounding his high-octane project Dhurandhar, acclaimed filmmaker…

2 days ago

Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey Movie Review: A God-Tier IMAX Masterpiece of War and Trauma

Byline: Kushinara M D Publication: New Delhi Chronicle Release Date: July 18, 2026 How do…

2 days ago

Ladakh Administration Overhaul: LG V K Saxena Approves Creation of 17 New Tehsils for Better Governance

NEW DELHI: In a major administrative push aimed at reshaping grassroots governance, Ladakh Lieutenant Governor…

1 week ago

Eknath Khadse Rejects Amit Shah’s BJP Offer, Vows to Stay with Sharad Pawar

By Political Bureau, New Delhi Chronicle MUMBAI: In a sensational revelation that has shaken Maharashtra’s…

1 week ago