NEWS

Himachal Pradesh High Court: Caste Assigned at Birth Cannot Change Through Marriage

In a significant ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has held that caste is determined at birth and does not change through marriage, impacting the application of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

New Delhi Chronicle Staff Reporter

Shimla:The Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled that caste is determined at birth and does not change if a person marries into a Scheduled Caste community. The decision came in the case of State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sarojioni (Cr. Revision No. 377 of 2013), decided on July 28, 2025.

Justice Rakesh Kainthla, delivering the judgment, clarified that such a marriage does not exempt an individual from prosecution under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

“Caste is assigned to a person at birth and remains unchanged throughout their lifetime,” Justice Kainthla observed. “The Trial Court erred in holding that the accused became a member of the Scheduled Caste community after her marriage and could not be prosecuted under Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act.”

What Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act States

Under Section 3(1)(s) of the Act, it is a punishable offence to abuse or insult a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe by using their caste name in any place within public view.

Trial Court’s Finding and High Court Reversal

The Trial Court had earlier concluded that the accused, by marrying a man from a Scheduled Caste community, automatically became part of that community and therefore could not commit an offence under Section 3(1)(s).

Challenging this interpretation, the State filed a criminal revision petition, asserting that caste is immutable and cannot be altered through marriage.

The High Court accepted this contention, setting aside the Trial Court’s decision and remanding the case for reconsideration regarding the framing of charges.

Case Details
• Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sarojioni
• Case Number: Cr. Revision No. 377 of 2013
• Date of Judgment: 28 July 2025
• For the Petitioner: Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General
• For the Respondent: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate

This ruling reinforces the legal position that caste identity in India is determined by birth and remains unaltered by marriage, with important implications for cases under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

ndcadmin

Recent Posts

Har Ghar Tiranga Campaign 2026: Amit Shah Calls for Mass Participation Ahead of Independence Day

By Political Bureau, New Delhi Chronicle⁠NEW DELHI | August 10, 2026⁠ NEW DELHI: Union Home…

2 days ago

Mayawati Opposes ‘Creamy Layer’ for SCs and STs in Reservation, Slams RSS Over ‘Casteist Mindset’

By Political Bureau | New Delhi Chronicle Published: August 9, 2026 | Lucknow / New…

2 days ago

Sangeetha Withdraws Divorce Petition Against Tamil Nadu CM Vijay in Chengalpattu Court

Byline: Political Bureau CHENNAI / NEW DELHI — Sangeetha Sornalingam, wife of Tamil Nadu Chief…

5 days ago

Veteran Actor Pradeep Rawat Passes Away After Battle With Cancer; Funeral Details Inside

By Entertainment Bureau New Delhi Chronicle Renowned Indian actor Pradeep Rawat, best known for portraying…

7 days ago

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Box Office Day 1: Tom Holland Stunner Shatters India Records, Surpasses Pathaan and Avengers: Endgame

By Entertainment Bureau | New Delhi Chronicle July 31, 2026 NEW DELHI — Marvel Cinematic…

2 weeks ago

Shehzad Poonawalla Drops BJP Title on X, Reshares Clips on Exiting Active Politics

 ⁠By Political Bureau | New Delhi Chronicle NEW DELHI — Speculation in national political circles…

2 weeks ago